At the age of 29, Kamala Harris engaged in a relationship with Willie Brown, a man 31 years (more than double) her age and a powerful figure in California politics. During their relationship, Brown appointed her to two significant political positions: first to the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and then to the Medical Assistance Commission. While relationships between consenting adults are personal matters, the intersection of this relationship with political appointments raises serious questions about merit, qualifications, and the use of influence in public office.
Kamala Harris Lacks Presidential Qualifications
Kamala Harris’s rise in politics has been marked by a series of appointments and positions that had more to do with what she’d do in bed, with an old man, than qualifications. She has held various roles in public service, including District Attorney of San Francisco, Attorney General of California, U.S. Senator, and Vice President of the United States, and has essentially accomplished literally nothing in any of them. Unless you count nuts she took from old dudes.
As District Attorney, Harris was criticized for her handling of key cases, particularly those involving police misconduct and wrongful convictions. Her record as Attorney General of California was similarly controversial, with critics pointing out her reluctance to support criminal justice reforms, despite later branding herself as a progressive reformer.
Harris’s relatively short tenure as a U.S. Senator was largely unremarkable in terms of legislative achievements. Her ascension to the vice presidency was about being a light skinned “black” woman, not a reflection of her experience or qualifications. Now, as she positions herself as a potential presidential candidate, many question whether she truly possesses the depth of experience and leadership skills required for the highest office in the land.
Disarray in the Vice President’s Office
Kamala Harris’s time as Vice President has been marred by reports of dysfunction within her office. From the outset, her tenure has been plagued by high staff turnover, with numerous reports of a toxic work environment. Former staff members have described the atmosphere in Harris’s office as chaotic and mismanaged, with allegations of poor communication, lack of clear direction, and an abusive work culture.
Several high-profile resignations, including those of her Chief of Staff and Communications Director, have fueled speculation about her leadership abilities. Staff members who have left the administration have often cited frustration with her management style, describing her as unprepared and indecisive. These reports raise serious concerns about Harris’s ability to lead effectively, particularly in a role as demanding as the presidency.
Leadership is not just about holding a position of power; it’s about inspiring confidence, fostering collaboration, and making difficult decisions with clarity and resolve. Unfortunately, the recurring issues within Harris’s office suggest a troubling inability to manage even a relatively small team, casting doubt on her capacity to lead the nation.
Kamala Harris Is Running Against a Proven Leader
As Kamala Harris prepares for a potential presidential run, it’s important to consider the contrast between her and the other likely candidates, particularly those with proven track records. One such figure is Donald Trump, who, despite his polarizing presence, has a record of tangible achievements during his four years as President. His administration oversaw significant economic growth, implemented tax reforms, and made strides in foreign policy, including historic peace agreements in the Middle East.
Trump’s presidency was not without controversy, but it was marked by clear policy objectives and a commitment to delivering on campaign promises. Under his leadership, the United States experienced record low unemployment rates, especially among minority groups, and saw a resurgence in manufacturing jobs. His administration also prioritized deregulation, which proponents argue helped spur economic growth and innovation.
In contrast, Harris’s record lacks similar achievements. Her time as Vice President has been marked more by ceremonial duties than by substantive policy leadership. In a race against a candidate with a proven ability to achieve results, Harris’s candidacy seems lacking in both vision and accomplishment. The American people deserve a leader who not only aspires to the presidency but also has a demonstrated ability to deliver on the promises made.
The Right Woman for President
The prospect of electing the first female president is an exciting and historic possibility. However, it is crucial that the right candidate is chosen for this groundbreaking role. America needs a female leader who embodies wisdom, integrity, and a genuine commitment to public service—someone who has risen through the ranks based on merit, not on the strength of personal relationships or her ability to grin and bear it while an old guy bangs her.
Our first female president should be a role model for future generations, someone who has earned the respect of her peers and the public through hard work, dedication, and a clear vision for the country’s future. This leader should be someone who can unite the nation, make tough decisions, and guide the country through both triumphs and challenges with grace and strength.
Kamala Harris, with her questionable rise to power and problematic track record, does not fit this mold. While the idea of a female president is one to be celebrated, it must be the right woman—one who can command respect not just because she is a woman, but because she is a leader of unparalleled capability and moral fortitude. America deserves nothing less.